Rather than automatically dividing assets and liabilities equally, the family court is tasked with making a fair and equitable division of the marital estate based on the specific circumstances of each case Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, Taylor-Cracraft v. Cracraft, 417 S.C. 570. Under South Carolina law, a spouse acquires a vested special equity and ownership right in the marital property during the marriage, which becomes subject to apportionment by the family court at the time marital litigation is filed or commenced S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-610.
The Four-Step Division Process
To divide the marital estate, the South Carolina Supreme Court and family courts generally follow a structured four-step process:
- Identify the Marital Property and Debt: The court must identify the specific real and personal property, as well as the debts, that are eligible for division Taylor-Cracraft v. Cracraft, 417 S.C. 570, Smith v. Smith, 280 S.C. 257.
- Determine the Value: The court must determine the fair market value of the identified marital assets and the exact amounts owed on the marital debts Taylor-Cracraft v. Cracraft, 417 S.C. 570, Smith v. Smith, 280 S.C. 257.
- Determine Proportional Contributions: The court identifies the direct and indirect contributions of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, appreciation, or depreciation of the marital estate Taylor-Cracraft v. Cracraft, 417 S.C. 570, Smith v. Smith, 280 S.C. 257.
- Equitably Apportion and Distribute: The court decides on the mechanics of distribution and provides for an equitable division of the marital estate Taylor-Cracraft v. Cracraft, 417 S.C. 570, Smith v. Smith, 280 S.C. 257.
Distinguishing Marital vs. Nonmarital Property and Debt
The family court has the jurisdiction and authority to divide only marital property and marital debt; it lacks the statutory authority to apportion nonmarital assets S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630.
- Marital Property: This includes all real and personal property acquired by the parties during the marriage and owned as of the date of filing or commencement of marital litigation, regardless of how legal title is held S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630. Interspousal gifts made directly or indirectly during the marriage are also classified as marital property S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630.
- Nonmarital Property: Specifically excluded from equitable distribution is property acquired by inheritance, devise, bequest, or third-party gift S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630; property acquired before the marriage S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630; property acquired after the filing of marital litigation, a pendente lite order, or the execution of a written settlement agreement S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630; property excluded by a written contract or voluntary antenuptial agreement executed with full financial disclosure and separate legal representation S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630; and any increase in the value of nonmarital property, unless that increase resulted directly or indirectly from the efforts of the non-owning spouse during the marriage S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630.
- Marital Debt: For the purposes of equitable distribution, marital debt is defined as debt incurred during the course of the marriage for the joint benefit of the parties Barrow v. Barrow, 394 S.C. 603, Mosley v. Mosley, 390 S.C. 524. This classification applies regardless of whether the parties are legally jointly liable or whether only one spouse is individually legally liable Barrow v. Barrow, 394 S.C. 603, Mosley v. Mosley, 390 S.C. 524. For example, income tax liabilities incurred by a party during the marriage constitute marital debt Barrow v. Barrow, 394 S.C. 603.
Statutory Factors for Equitable Apportionment
In determining how to weight and distribute the marital estate, South Carolina family courts must consider and weigh the following fifteen statutory factors:
- Duration and Ages: The duration of the marriage and the ages of the parties both at the time of marriage and at the time of divorce Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Marital Misconduct or Fault: Marital misconduct or fault that affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage, provided the conduct occurred prior to the earliest of a pendente lite order, a signed property settlement, or a permanent separate maintenance order Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Value and Contributions: The value of the marital property and the quality and existence of each spouse's contribution to its acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation, including contributions as a homemaker Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Income and Earning Potential: The income, earning potential, and opportunity for future capital asset acquisition of each spouse Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Health: The physical and emotional health of each spouse Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Training and Education: The need of either spouse for additional training or education to achieve their income potential Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Nonmarital Property: The existence and value of the nonmarital property of each spouse Taylor-Cracraft v. Cracraft, 417 S.C. 570, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Retirement Benefits: The existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for either spouse Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Alimony: Whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- The Family Home: The desirability of awarding the family home (or the right to live there for reasonable periods) to the spouse who has custody of any children Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Tax Consequences: The tax consequences to either party resulting from the equitable apportionment Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Support Obligations: The existence and extent of support obligations from a prior marriage or other reasons Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Liens and Debts: Liens and encumbrances on the marital or separate property, and any other existing debts incurred during the marriage Barrow v. Barrow, 394 S.C. 603, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Child Custody: Child custody arrangements and obligations at the time the order is entered Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
- Other Factors: Any other relevant factors that the trial court expressly enumerates in its order Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
Secondary authorities, citing South Carolina jurisprudence, note that the objective when dividing marital property is to sever joint ownership interests as completely as possible, starting with the premise that the marital home should be distributed at the time the divorce judgment is entered .
Qualifications and Limitations
The family court is granted broad discretion in weighing these statutory factors based on the specific facts of each case Taylor-Cracraft v. Cracraft, 417 S.C. 570, Mosley v. Mosley, 390 S.C. 524. While there is no recognized legal presumption in favor of an equal fifty-fifty division of property, South Carolina courts approve of an equal division as an appropriate starting point for dividing the estate of a long-term marriage Brown v. Brown, 412 S.C. 225, Ricigliano v. Ricigliano, 413 S.C. 319. This starting point serves to protect nonworking spouses who managed household duties and prevents distributions based solely on direct financial contributions Brown v. Brown, 412 S.C. 225. Additionally, while marital fault or misconduct (such as adultery) that caused the breakup of the marriage is a permissible consideration, South Carolina law does not allow fault to be used as a punitive factor or to justify a severe penalty Ricigliano v. Ricigliano, 413 S.C. 319.
Once a family court enters an order affecting the distribution of marital property, it is deemed a final order and is not subject to subsequent modification, except by direct appeal or upon a remand following a proper appeal S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620.
In summary, property and debt division in a South Carolina divorce is determined by equitably apportioning marital assets and debts while keeping nonmarital assets separate. The court determines the fair market value of the marital estate and applies a multi-factor statutory test to distribute the property and liabilities in a manner that fairly reflects each spouse's contributions and economic circumstances. Although an equal split is often used as a baseline for long-term marriages, the final distribution is tailored to the unique equities of each case, and once finalized, the property division cannot be modified.
At Seibert Law and Mediation, we believe families thrive when they are empowered to build solutions, not forced into conflict. If you’re facing a difficult chapter, we’re here to help you move forward with clarity, compassion, and dignity. The most important step you can take is to speak with an experienced family court attorney immediately.
Divorces, Separate Maintenance and Support, and custody and visitation matters in South Carolina can be highly technical, and small factual details often make the biggest difference. If you or someone in your family is faced with family court, don’t assume the case is open-and-shut. At Seibert Law and Mediation, we examine every angle to fight for the best possible outcome.
Contact Seibert Law and Mediation for a confidential consultation. If you need help, reach out to speak to us at (843) 554-0686 or via text at (843) 594-2101. Your defense starts today with understanding how your case begins. You don’t have to face a family court matter alone.
Seibert Law and Mediation serves lowcountry South Carolina in: Charleston, Johns Island, West Ashley, James Island, Daniel Island, Mount Pleasant, Summerville, Goose Creek, Moncks Corner, and surrounding communities as well as upstate South Carolina in Spartanburg and Greenville, and surrounding communities.