Under South Carolina law, Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Distribute (PWID) is a criminal offense that makes it unlawful for any person to possess marijuana, a controlled substance, with the intent to distribute it S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-370. The offense is composed of two primary factual elements that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) knowing possession of the controlled substance, and (2) the intent to distribute that substance State v. Robinson, 306 S.C. 323.
Elements of the Offense
To secure a conviction for PWID, the State must establish the following elements:
Knowing Possession: The accused must have both the power and intent to control the disposition or use of the marijuana State v. Robinson, 306 S.C. 323, State v. Goldsmith, 301 S.C. 463. Possession may be actual or constructive, and it can be inferred from the surrounding circumstances S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-370, State v. Goldsmith, 301 S.C. 463. Actual knowledge of the presence of the contraband serves as strong evidence of an intent to control its disposition or use State v. Robinson, 306 S.C. 323, State v. Goldsmith, 301 S.C. 463.
Intent to Distribute: The prosecution must prove that the defendant possessed the marijuana with the specific intent to distribute it State v. Andrews, 324 S.C. 516.
Indicia of Intent and Evidentiary Thresholds
A conviction for PWID does not turn or hinge on the specific quantity of marijuana involved; possession of any amount of a controlled substance, when coupled with sufficient circumstances or indicia of intent to distribute, is legally sufficient to support a conviction State v. Robinson, 306 S.C. 323, State v. Goldsmith, 301 S.C. 463, State v. Simpson, 275 S.C. 426. However, South Carolina law establishes a statutory threshold where possession of a certain quantity creates a prima facie case:
Statutory Presumption: Possession of more than 28 grams (or one ounce) of marijuana establishes a prima facie case of possession with intent to distribute State v. Goldsmith, 301 S.C. 463, State v. Andrews, 324 S.C. 516. This creates an evidentiary inference of intent, which the jury may consider alongside other evidence, but it is not binding and does not relieve the State of its burden to prove the element of intent beyond a reasonable doubt State v. Andrews, 324 S.C. 516.
Other Indicia of Intent: If the amount of marijuana is less than the 28-gram threshold, the State may still prove intent to distribute through circumstantial evidence or other indicia State v. Goldsmith, 301 S.C. 463. For example, proof of possessing drug paraphernalia, such as small, delicate scales used to weigh small amounts, constitutes sufficient indicia of intent to distribute to submit the charge to a jury State v. Goldsmith, 301 S.C. 463, State v. Durham, 266 S.C. 263.
Relation to Trafficking and Other Offenses
Under South Carolina's statutory scheme, PWID marijuana is recognized as a lesser included offense of trafficking in marijuana when the trafficking charge is based upon possession S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-370, Harden v. State, 360 S.C. 405. Consequently, a defendant generally cannot be convicted of both PWID and trafficking based on possession when both charges arise from a single, identical act of possession Harden v. State, 360 S.C. 405. However, separate convictions may stand if the trafficking conviction is based on a broader conspiracy rather than the individual transaction supporting the distribution-related charge Harden v. State, 360 S.C. 405. Furthermore, when there is conflicting evidence regarding whether the weight of the marijuana is sufficient to trigger the trafficking statute, both the PWID and trafficking charges should be submitted to the jury; if the undisputed evidence shows the quantity exceeds the trafficking threshold, only the trafficking charge is submitted State v. Kirkpatrick, 320 S.C. 38.
Additionally, PWID is treated as a separate, distinct criminal offense if it occurs within a one-half mile radius of the grounds of a school, public playground or park, vocational or technical center, or college or university S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-445. To convict a defendant of this separate offense, the State must prove the defendant had knowledge of being within the one-half mile radius and actually possessed the controlled substance with the intent to distribute within that zone S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-445.
Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Distribute in South Carolina requires proof of knowing possession and an intent to distribute. While possessing more than 28 grams triggers a non-binding evidentiary presumption of intent, a conviction can be supported by any quantity of marijuana if accompanied by sufficient indicia of intent, such as drug packaging materials or weighing scales.
Elements
Possession: The defendant had actual or constructive possession of the marijuana State v. Brown, 267 S.C. 311, State v. Stanley, 365 S.C. 24.
Knowledge: The defendant knowingly possessed the substance State v. Brown, 267 S.C. 311.
Intent to Distribute: The defendant possessed the marijuana with the specific intent to distribute it State v. Adams, 291 S.C. 132.
Presumption of Intent: Possession of more than 28 grams (one ounce) of marijuana or 10 grams of hashish constitutes prima facie evidence of an intent to distribute S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-370. However, a conviction for possession with intent to distribute does not solely hinge upon the amount involved; it can be proven through other circumstantial evidence, such as drug paraphernalia and residue State v. Adams, 291 S.C. 132.
Defenses
Lack of Intent to Distribute (Lesser Included Offense): If the amount of marijuana is less than the statutory presumption threshold (28 grams), the defendant is entitled to a jury charge on the lesser included offense of simple possession, arguing a lack of intent to distribute State v. Adams, 291 S.C. 132.
General Possession Defenses: Lack of actual or constructive possession, lack of knowledge, or mere presence State v. Brown, 267 S.C. 311, State v. Stanley, 365 S.C. 24.
Penalties
First or Second Offenses: Sentences may be suspended and probation granted, and offenders are eligible for parole, supervised furlough, community supervision, work release, and statutory credits S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-370.
Third or Subsequent Offense: Guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be imprisoned for not more than 15 years, fined not more than $10,000, or both S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-370.
Under South Carolina law, marijuana offenses are categorized based on the quantity of the substance involved, ranging from simple possession of small amounts to major trafficking offenses. South Carolina strictly regulates marijuana, drawing clear lines between minor possession and major trafficking operations. Simple possession of small quantities is treated as a misdemeanor, offering opportunities for conditional discharges or diversion programs. In contrast, possessing larger quantities triggers legal presumptions of an intent to distribute, and reaching the ten-pound threshold subjects defendants to severe felony trafficking charges with mandatory minimum prison sentences that cannot be suspended. Effectively defending against these charges typically relies on challenging the prosecution's evidence of constructive possession, knowledge, or intent.
Criminal defense in South Carolina is technical and detail-driven. Small facts often make the biggest difference.
Protect Your Record and Your Future
If you’ve been charged with a crime in Charleston or anywhere in South Carolina, the most important step you can take is to speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately.
At Seibert Law and Mediation, we analyze every detail of how your case began and build a targeted strategy to protect your rights.
Contact Seibert Law and Mediation for a confidential consultation. If you need help, reach out to speak to us at (843) 554-0685 or via text at (843) 594-2101. Your defense starts today with understanding how your case begins. You don’t have to face a criminal charge alone.
Seibert Law and Mediation serves lowcountry South Carolina in: Charleston, Johns Island, West Ashley, James Island, Daniel Island, Mount Pleasant, Summerville, Goose Creek, Moncks Corner, and surrounding communities as well as upstate South Carolina in Spartanburg and Greenville, and surrounding communities.